From: Ikhwan Lee <ikhwan.lee@samsung.com>
To: mgross@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: Voltage/power domain framework?
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:48:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00c701c6c9ce$a721bd50$4686190c@dsn.sec.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060825180017.GA7636@linux.intel.com
Thanks for your note,
> > I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of
voltage/power
> > domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were
> > some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web.
>
> There isn't anything formal going on. However; there is a loose
> collection of folks working on the "operating point" patches with an eye
> to defining a lower level interface to enable voltage/power/clock domain
> framework's.
I have been following the threads on both PowerOp and OpPoint; however, I
never thought they would do the job of voltage/power/clock domain
frameworks. The way I interpreted is that they _need_ the domain frameworks
so that they could handle lower-level physics better.
> Do you have some design ideas, patches, or requirements in this area that
could be
> taken into account?
I have requirements and some very rough ideas. And I was searching for an
existing implementation or a discussion so that I can find a place to start
with. Maybe we can start by writing down the requirements. As far as I know,
the CELF PM Requirement document does not have a section for voltage/power
domain frameworks.
Regards,
Ikhwan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-27 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.2682.1156469445.1142.linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
2006-08-25 7:50 ` Voltage/power domain framework? Ikhwan Lee
2006-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-27 11:48 ` Ikhwan Lee [this message]
2006-08-27 18:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-28 20:24 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-26 13:13 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00c701c6c9ce$a721bd50$4686190c@dsn.sec.samsung.com' \
--to=ikhwan.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox