From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dietmar Eggemann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] sched/fair: Create util_fits_capacity() Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:20:05 +0200 Message-ID: <0184b049-9333-2b6b-09a0-bdb71f491e25@arm.com> References: <20180406153607.17815-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20180406153607.17815-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20180412070230.GV7671@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180412070230.GV7671@vireshk-i7> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Quentin Perret , Thara Gopinath , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Morten Rasmussen , Chris Redpath , Patrick Bellasi , Valentin Schneider , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vincent Guittot , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Juri Lelli , Steve Muckle , Eduardo Valentin List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 04/12/2018 09:02 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 06-04-18, 16:36, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity >> is factored out into a separate function. >> >> Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure >> out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized. >> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra >> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann >> --- >> kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++++++- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c >> index 0951d1c58d2f..0a76ad2ef022 100644 >> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c >> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c >> @@ -6574,6 +6574,11 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) >> return min_t(unsigned long, util, capacity_orig_of(cpu)); >> } >> >> +static inline int util_fits_capacity(unsigned long util, unsigned long capacity) >> +{ >> + return capacity * 1024 > util * capacity_margin; > > This changes the behavior slightly compared to existing code. If that > wasn't intentional, perhaps you should use >= here. You're right here ... Already on our v3 list. Thanks! The 'misfit' patch-set comes with a similar function task_fits_capacity() so we have to align on this one with this patch-set as well. [...]