Re: [PATCH v2 01/30] pm: Improve EXPORT_*_DEV_PM_OPS macros

[Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>]

Le sam., oct. 1 2022 at 18:01:30 +0100, Jonathan Cameron 
<jic23@kernel.org> a écrit :
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:35:35 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>>  On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 3:27 PM Paul Cercueil 
>> <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Hi,
>>  >
>>  > Le lun., sept. 26 2022 at 14:00:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
>>  > <rafael@kernel.org> a écrit :
>>  > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 4:52 PM Jonathan Cameron 
>> <jic23@kernel.org>
>>  > > wrote:
>>  > >>
>>  > >>  On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 23:42:53 +0100
>>  > >>  Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:
>>  > >>
>>  > >>  > Hi Rafael,
>>  > >>  >
>>  > >>  > Le mar., août 23 2022 at 19:47:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
>>  > >>  > <rafael@kernel.org> a écrit :
>>  > >>  > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 7:41 PM Paul Cercueil
>>  > >> <paul@crapouillou.net>
>>  > >>  > > wrote:
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  Update the _EXPORT_DEV_PM_OPS() internal macro. It was 
>> not
>>  > >> used
>>  > >>  > >> anywhere
>>  > >>  > >>  outside pm.h and pm_runtime.h, so it is safe to update 
>> it.
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  Before, this macro would take a few parameters to be 
>> used as
>>  > >> sleep
>>  > >>  > >> and
>>  > >>  > >>  runtime callbacks. This made it unsuitable to use with
>>  > >> different
>>  > >>  > >>  callbacks, for instance the "noirq" ones.
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  It is now semantically different: instead of creating a
>>  > >>  > >> conditionally
>>  > >>  > >>  exported dev_pm_ops structure, it only contains part of 
>> the
>>  > >>  > >> definition.
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  This macro should however never be used directly (hence 
>> the
>>  > >> trailing
>>  > >>  > >>  underscore). Instead, the following four macros are 
>> provided:
>>  > >>  > >>  - EXPORT_DEV_PM_OPS(name)
>>  > >>  > >>  - EXPORT_GPL_DEV_PM_OPS(name)
>>  > >>  > >>  - EXPORT_NS_DEV_PM_OPS(name, ns)
>>  > >>  > >>  - EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_PM_OPS(name, ns)
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  For instance, it is now possible to conditionally 
>> export noirq
>>  > >>  > >>  suspend/resume PM functions like this:
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  EXPORT_GPL_DEV_PM_OPS(foo_pm_ops) = {
>>  > >>  > >>      NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn)
>>  > >>  > >>  };
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  The existing helper macros EXPORT_*_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() 
>> and
>>  > >>  > >>  EXPORT_*_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS() have been updated to use 
>> these
>>  > >> new
>>  > >>  > >> macros.
>>  > >>  > >>
>>  > >>  > >>  Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
>>  > >>  > >
>>  > >>  > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>  > >>  > >
>>  > >>  > > or please let me know if you need me to pick up this one.
>>  > >>  >
>>  > >>  > Could you pick this one up then, and make a branch for 
>> Jonathan?
>>  > >>
>>  > >>  Hi Paul, Rafael,
>>  > >>
>>  > >>  What happened to this in the end?  I can't immediately find 
>> it on
>>  > >>  any of the pm git tree branches.
>>  > >>
>>  > >>  At this stage in the cycle it would be great if this patch at 
>> least
>>  > >>  makes the merge window, so we can make use of it next cycle.
>>  > >
>>  > > I thought that this would go in along with the other patches in 
>> the
>>  > > series.
>>  > >
>>  > > I can apply it directly, though, if needed.
>>  > >
>>  > > Thanks!
>>  >
>>  > I think at this point Jonathan can just take it in his tree with 
>> his
>>  > own patchset. Then I'll rebase this patchset on v6.1-rc1.
>> 
>>  Sure.
>> 
>>  Jonathan, please go ahead and take the patch directly.
> 
> Too late for me to take this for this cycle (I route via Greg KH so 
> need to have things
> in place a little bit before the merge window).  If Lee doesn't pick 
> it up, I'll do an
> immutable branch after rc1 is out with just this patch on it, then 
> anyone who wants
> it can pick it up.

Rafael or Lee, can you take it now?

Or is it already too late? :(

-Paul