From: "Barnabás Czémán" <barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] MSM8953/SDM632 rpmpd/mss fixes
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 21:38:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <083d2560294855857663df23e8900f9b@mainlining.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lv2ali4zgsfdh54yd74cx5mvec2z5kg7v4rkayyukpjt6juyft@vzprb3rvewkm>
On 2026-03-27 21:33, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:11:42PM +0100, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>> SDM632 pm domains are different from MSM8953 because MSM8953
>> is defining pm8953_s1 as regulator but SDM632 is defining it
>> as pm domain.
>>
>> This patch series correcting the pm domains defined in rpmpd
>> driver and splitting the MSS resources for the both SoC to match
>> the reality.
>>
>> These changes was discussed in a previous threads:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2b057aa5-4416-4fd4-aeab-6bc23acbb53d@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
> Was 4.9 never expected to work on MSM8953? Or did it require firmware
> changes?
There is no official 4.9 kernel for MSM8953 devices, all of them are
using 3.18.
There are unofficial 4.9 ports for those devices but all of them
defining s1 as
a regulator so the regulators were changed back like it was on 3.18.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org>
>> ---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 20:11 [PATCH 0/7] MSM8953/SDM632 rpmpd/mss fixes Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: power: qcom-rpmpd: Split MSM8953 and SDM632 Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:26 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-28 8:22 ` Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-29 9:51 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-29 9:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-27 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/7] pmdomain: qcom: rpmpd: Split SDM632 pm domains from MSM8953 Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:11 ` [PATCH 3/7] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Use mss as regulator for MSM8953 Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8953: fix modem pm domains Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:35 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-27 20:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,msm8916-mss-pil: Add SDM632 Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Add SDM632 MSS Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:11 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm632: Correct power domains Barnabás Czémán
2026-03-27 20:33 ` [PATCH 0/7] MSM8953/SDM632 rpmpd/mss fixes Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-27 20:38 ` Barnabás Czémán [this message]
2026-03-27 20:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=083d2560294855857663df23e8900f9b@mainlining.org \
--to=barnabas.czeman@mainlining.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox