From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2, v2] cpufreq: build fixes
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:33:14 +0100
Message-ID: <10255235.LPNNEu8bEf@vostro.rjw.lan>
References: <7331404.XKGG8rohnR@wuerfel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <7331404.XKGG8rohnR@wuerfel>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 09:54:01 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is an unmodified re-send of two patches I originally submitted
> on January 28. Both patches were Acked by Viresh, while a third patch
> got replaced with a better fix. Please merge these through the cpufreq
> tree for 3.20 and backports.

OK

It would be useful to know what series of "stable" you want them in,
but I can say "all applicable" too.

Rafael