From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched / idle: Make cpuidle_idle_call() void Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:36:42 +0200 Message-ID: <107574725.ErYUTC83FZ@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <4717784.WmVEpDoliM@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140422114930.GH11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:61919 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751402AbaDVXUX (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:20:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140422114930.GH11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux PM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Daniel Lezcano , Ingo Molnar On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 01:49:30 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:26:58AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > The only value ever returned by cpuidle_idle_call() is 0 and its > > only caller ignores that value anyway, so make it void. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Thanks! OK, thanks, so should it go through my tree or through tip? -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.