From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] cpufreq: ondemand: only queue canceled works from update_sampling_rate() Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:10:12 +0200 Message-ID: <110936806.IYePDC4zPm@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <32794142.WpJFa6Ni1D@vostro.rjw.lan> <20150909023020.GI7639@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:64892 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752066AbbIITmW (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:42:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150909023020.GI7639@linux> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, preeti.lkml@gmail.com, open list On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 08:00:20 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 09-09-15, 03:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I've just realized that if you combined this patch with the [6/9], > > you wouldn't need to make any changes to gov_queue_work() at all, > > because that patch removes the case in point entirely. > > Yeah, but then these are really two separate issues at hand and so I > solved them separately. Lemme know how you want to see that and I can > change :) I don't want to make artificial changes. If you can address two problems in one go with one relatively simple patch, why don't you do that? Thanks, Rafael