IRC Meeting

IRC Meeting

[Patrick Mochel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1086 bytes --]


Hi everyone.

I think we should start having some IRC meetings next week. We have a lot
to talk about, and a lot of ideas to kick around. I don't think we can, or
should try, to talk about everything in one shot, so it would help to
priortize and organize the meetings. :)

That said, I think it would be good to have a few meetings in a row so we
can get everything out on the table. Say, 1 per week for the first three
weeks, then every other week. Would people be interested in that?

Thursday would work best for me next week, and seems like a good day
anyway. For times, I suggest we rotate the time over the course of three
weeks so we all get a good time and a painful one. :)

How about this:


Meeting 1:

AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
--
3/18, 00:00	3/17, 07:00	3/17, 10:00	3/17, 17:00


Meeting 2:

AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
--
3/25, 07:00	3/24, 14:00	3/24, 17:00	3/24, 23:00


Meeting 3:

AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
--
3/31, 15:00	3/30, 22:00	3/31, 01:00	3/31, 07:00


Someone in the "Comfortable Timezone" can be the one that takes notes and
summarizes each week.


	Pat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: IRC Meeting

[Nigel Cunningham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1732 bytes --]

Hi.

On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 08:26, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> 
> I think we should start having some IRC meetings next week. We have a lot
> to talk about, and a lot of ideas to kick around. I don't think we can, or
> should try, to talk about everything in one shot, so it would help to
> priortize and organize the meetings. :)
> 
> That said, I think it would be good to have a few meetings in a row so we
> can get everything out on the table. Say, 1 per week for the first three
> weeks, then every other week. Would people be interested in that?
> 
> Thursday would work best for me next week, and seems like a good day
> anyway. For times, I suggest we rotate the time over the course of three
> weeks so we all get a good time and a painful one. :)
> 
> How about this:
> 
> 
> Meeting 1:
> 
> AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
> --
> 3/18, 00:00	3/17, 07:00	3/17, 10:00	3/17, 17:00
> 
> 
> Meeting 2:
> 
> AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
> --
> 3/25, 07:00	3/24, 14:00	3/24, 17:00	3/24, 23:00
> 
> 
> Meeting 3:
> 
> AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
> --
> 3/31, 15:00	3/30, 22:00	3/31, 01:00	3/31, 07:00

Ben and I should move to Perth. That would make life easier :>

> 
> Someone in the "Comfortable Timezone" can be the one that takes notes and
> summarizes each week.

Speaking of that, I've been considering trying to summarise the outcomes
of all our little subthreads so far. Does that sound like a good idea?
I'm happy to volunteer to do it, but it won't be done until Monday my
time.

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com
Bus: +61 (2) 6291 9554; Hme: +61 (2) 6292 8028;  Mob: +61 (417) 100 574

Maintainer of Suspend2 Kernel Patches http://suspend2.net


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: IRC Meeting

[Patrick Mochel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 748 bytes --]


On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

> Ben and I should move to Perth. That would make life easier :>

Cool, I'll go too!

> > Someone in the "Comfortable Timezone" can be the one that takes notes and
> > summarizes each week.
>
> Speaking of that, I've been considering trying to summarise the outcomes
> of all our little subthreads so far. Does that sound like a good idea?
> I'm happy to volunteer to do it, but it won't be done until Monday my
> time.

Heh, I've been thinking about the same for months actually. :) We should
have some sort of working document about what's going on. It could serve
two purposes: to document existing practices and to document future plans.
Please feel free to post something in some format..


	Pat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: IRC Meeting

[Jordan Crouse]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 589 bytes --]

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:41:43 -0800 (PST)
"Patrick Mochel" <mochel-og82NyAXoxR0I81aPRRTmR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Heh, I've been thinking about the same for months actually. :) We
> should have some sort of working document about what's going on. It
> could serve two purposes: to document existing practices and to
> document future plans. Please feel free to post something in some
> format..

A wiki would be best, I think for a living document.

Jordan

-- 
Jordan Crouse
Senior Linux Engineer
AMD - Personal Connectivity Solutions Group
<www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: IRC Meeting

[Nigel Cunningham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 895 bytes --]

That's a good idea.

Bernard being the wiz that he is, I'm sure he could set us up one on
suspend2.net. Shall I ask?

Regards,

Nigel

On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 08:53, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:41:43 -0800 (PST)
> "Patrick Mochel" <mochel-og82NyAXoxR0I81aPRRTmR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > Heh, I've been thinking about the same for months actually. :) We
> > should have some sort of working document about what's going on. It
> > could serve two purposes: to document existing practices and to
> > document future plans. Please feel free to post something in some
> > format..
> 
> A wiki would be best, I think for a living document.
> 
> Jordan
-- 
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com
Bus: +61 (2) 6291 9554; Hme: +61 (2) 6292 8028;  Mob: +61 (417) 100 574

Maintainer of Suspend2 Kernel Patches http://suspend2.net


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: IRC Meeting

[Adam Belay]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1217 bytes --]

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:26 -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> 
> I think we should start having some IRC meetings next week. We have a lot
> to talk about, and a lot of ideas to kick around. I don't think we can, or
> should try, to talk about everything in one shot, so it would help to
> priortize and organize the meetings. :)
> 
> That said, I think it would be good to have a few meetings in a row so we
> can get everything out on the table. Say, 1 per week for the first three
> weeks, then every other week. Would people be interested in that?

Yeah, I think it could be very useful.

> 
> Thursday would work best for me next week, and seems like a good day
> anyway. For times, I suggest we rotate the time over the course of three
> weeks so we all get a good time and a painful one. :)
> 
> How about this:

The latter two would work for me (US EST).

Thanks,
Adam


> 
> 
> Meeting 1:
> 
> AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
> --
> 3/18, 00:00	3/17, 07:00	3/17, 10:00	3/17, 17:00
> 
> 
> Meeting 2:
> 
> AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
> --
> 3/25, 07:00	3/24, 14:00	3/24, 17:00	3/24, 23:00
> 
> 
> Meeting 3:
> 
> AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
> --
> 3/31, 15:00	3/30, 22:00	3/31, 01:00	3/31, 07:00
> 



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: IRC Meeting

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 967 bytes --]

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:26 -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> 
> I think we should start having some IRC meetings next week. We have a lot
> to talk about, and a lot of ideas to kick around. I don't think we can, or
> should try, to talk about everything in one shot, so it would help to
> priortize and organize the meetings. :)
> 
> That said, I think it would be good to have a few meetings in a row so we
> can get everything out on the table. Say, 1 per week for the first three
> weeks, then every other week. Would people be interested in that?
> 
> Thursday would work best for me next week, and seems like a good day
> anyway. For times, I suggest we rotate the time over the course of three
> weeks so we all get a good time and a painful one. :)
> 
> How about this:

Can we post the agreed date/hours of the IRC meeting somewhere ? Or have
something re-post them at least 1 day before the meeting ? I'm bad at
managing my own time :)


Ben.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]

Re: IRC Meeting

[Nigel Cunningham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1384 bytes --]

Hi.

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 09:25, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:26 -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> > 
> > I think we should start having some IRC meetings next week. We have a lot
> > to talk about, and a lot of ideas to kick around. I don't think we can, or
> > should try, to talk about everything in one shot, so it would help to
> > priortize and organize the meetings. :)
> > 
> > That said, I think it would be good to have a few meetings in a row so we
> > can get everything out on the table. Say, 1 per week for the first three
> > weeks, then every other week. Would people be interested in that?
> > 
> > Thursday would work best for me next week, and seems like a good day
> > anyway. For times, I suggest we rotate the time over the course of three
> > weeks so we all get a good time and a painful one. :)
> > 
> > How about this:
> 
> Can we post the agreed date/hours of the IRC meeting somewhere ? Or have
> something re-post them at least 1 day before the meeting ? I'm bad at
> managing my own time :)

http://linux-pm.suspend2.net/MeetingsPlanned

I'll post a reminder to the list too if you like.

Nigel
-- 
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com
Bus: +61 (2) 6291 9554; Hme: +61 (2) 6292 8028;  Mob: +61 (417) 100 574

Maintainer of Suspend2 Kernel Patches http://suspend2.net


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]

RE: IRC Meeting

[Brown, Len]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 556 bytes --]

Times are fine with me (US EST)

Would it make sense to set up an audio phone bridge, or is IRC
preferred?

thanks,
-Len

>How about this:
>
>
>Meeting 1:
>
>AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
>--
>3/18, 00:00	3/17, 07:00	3/17, 10:00	3/17, 17:00
>
>
>Meeting 2:
>
>AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
>--
>3/25, 07:00	3/24, 14:00	3/24, 17:00	3/24, 23:00
>
>
>Meeting 3:
>
>AU		US PST		US EST		EU Time
>--
>3/31, 15:00	3/30, 22:00	3/31, 01:00	3/31, 07:00
>
>
>Someone in the "Comfortable Timezone" can be the one that 
>takes notes and
>summarizes each week.
>
>
>	Pat
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

RE: IRC Meeting

[Patrick Mochel]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 272 bytes --]


On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Brown, Len wrote:

> Times are fine with me (US EST)
>
> Would it make sense to set up an audio phone bridge, or is IRC
> preferred?

I much prefer IRC; I'm much more of a visual person rather than an audial
one. And, I hate the telephone. :)


	Pat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

RE: IRC Meeting

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 356 bytes --]

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:42 -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Brown, Len wrote:
> 
> > Times are fine with me (US EST)
> >
> > Would it make sense to set up an audio phone bridge, or is IRC
> > preferred?
> 
> I much prefer IRC; I'm much more of a visual person rather than an audial
> one. And, I hate the telephone. :)

Yah, me too :)


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Re: IRC Meeting

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 219 bytes --]

> Times are fine with me (US EST)
> 
> Would it make sense to set up an audio phone bridge, or is IRC
> preferred?

I do not think I can do audio.
								Pavel
-- 
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 171 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm