From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Mapping Device Power States
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:56:24 +1000
Message-ID: <1112918184.9568.335.camel@gaston>
References: <1112909150.21887.18.camel@linux.site>
	<200504071504.47531.david-b@pacbell.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============66722767687173623=="
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <200504071504.47531.david-b@pacbell.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>, Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

--===============66722767687173623==
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 15:04 -0700, David Brownell wrote:


> In short:  why should there be any Linux-wide notion like that?
> Wouldn't trying to create one just be the problem of creating a
> "Grand Unified Theory of Power Management"?

Hrm...

Each time somebody comes up with an attempt at providing a generic model
that could be useful enough for most driver, you come up with your
"grand unified bla bla bla" argument as a way of dismissal... not very
constructive.

Ben.



--===============66722767687173623==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============66722767687173623==--