Re: Re: freeze_processes questions

[Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

Hi,
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:53, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Sorry for raising the problem again after a long time. I got some
> > reports about ' xxx not stopped' at suspend time. The general cause
> is
> > one task is waiting for another task which has been into
> refrigerator
> > first. Report an error and stop suspend can't solve the problem.
> After
> > the task's dependent task is released from refrigerator, the task
> itself
> > will soon go into refrigerator and will never be waked up. 
> > Nigel's refrigerator patch half solves the problem. It distinct
> kernel
> > tasks and user tasks, so can solve the dependence between kernel
> tasks
> > and user tasks, but can't solve the user tasks dependence. Right,
> Nigel?
> 
> That's right, but the example you give below is userspace (syslogd) vs
> kernel space (kjournald), so I wonder if something could be wrong with
> your implementation.
Right, my example can be solved with your patch. But I'd like a more
generic solution to solve all the dependences, like user space tasks
dependencies.

Thanks,
Shaohua


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]