Re: Re: freeze_processes questions

[Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1584 bytes --]

Hi.

On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 15:21, Li Shaohua wrote:
> > Do you have a particular example in mind? I haven't seen or heard of
> > any
> > freezing failures in Suspend2 for ages, so I'm struggling to see what
> > is
> > lacking.
> No, actually. Maybe I should send the proposal till I really find a case
> :). I only noticed the syslogd case. Somebody reported the
> 'mdnsresponder' process case, but didn't look at it yet.
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3964

Ah. Ok. The ipw2100 driver starts a workqueue. Since I also have patches
to make kthreads freezable, we sometimes have to tell people to add an
extra parameter to the create_workqueue call. Once that's done, I
believe it all works fine.

I keep saying I must seek to merge these patches. I've gotten caught up
on trying to get everything ready to merge at once, and confused by what
Pavel is and isn't changing :> Pavel, since you're cc'd I might as well
ask, am I still right to submit those patches again? If so, I'll try to
do it this evening.

On a related topic, I've tried to get hotplug cpu support working with
suspending, but it looks like more is needed. In particular, the 'dead'
cpu still needs state saved and restored, so we're not really gaining
anything with the current implementation. If hotplug really killed the
CPU and rebooted it, the story might be different.

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com
Bus: +61 (2) 6291 9554; Hme: +61 (2) 6292 8028;  Mob: +61 (417) 100 574

Maintainer of Suspend2 Kernel Patches http://suspend2.net


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]