From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:18:00 +1000 Message-ID: <1117750680.31082.81.camel@gaston> References: <1117524577.5826.35.camel@gaston> <20050531101344.GB9614@elf.ucw.cz> <1117550660.5826.42.camel@gaston> <20050531212556.GA14968@elf.ucw.cz> <429F321D.9000009@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============06494105195107025==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <429F321D.9000009@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Stefan Seyfried Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , Linux Kernel list , Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============06494105195107025== Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:21 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > >> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events, > >> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that > >> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as > >> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly. > > > > Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too? > > No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of > notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep > it alive. Euh... maybe but I still think we need to keep this userland interface alive for a little while. At least ARM and PPC have existing stuff that rely on it. Ben. --===============06494105195107025== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============06494105195107025==--