From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Suspend "core": what to do now ? Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:49:54 +1000 Message-ID: <1119851395.5133.112.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============86748740151638482==" Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Linux-pm mailing list Cc: Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============86748740151638482== Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi ! So I'm still sitting on that rewrite of the pmac suspend code including suspend to disk consolidation etc... that I would really like to get upstream. However, I'm still having a problem: - I'm still adding all those callbacks to pm_ops, Patrick wants to get the stuff out of the core, which I agree, but I don't feel like "fixing" x86 neither :) Pavel wants to keep the existing stuff. - If I keep my callbacks addition, we need to consolidate kernel/power/disk.c with kernel/power/main.c. I need all callbacks in both cases. The current inconsistency makes little sense. - I want that in 2.6.13 final, so please, let's decide something :) Ben. --===============86748740151638482== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============86748740151638482==--