From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: Suspend "core": what to do now ? Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:37:41 +1000 Message-ID: <1119940660.7513.24.camel@localhost> References: <1119851395.5133.112.camel@gaston> <1119912918.30369.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1119916159.5133.145.camel@gaston> <1119931577.5133.189.camel@gaston> Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============64495334222628542==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1119931577.5133.189.camel@gaston> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Adam Belay , Linux-pm mailing list , Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============64495334222628542== Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi. On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 14:06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I'm inclined to just trash all of that... but Nigel will have the same > problem here, if I start moving the core of swsusp to arch code, he'll > have to move the core of swsusp2 accordingly. I have the problem that I have so little arch dependant code that it seems silly to make the switch, but I also like the idea (as mentioned on irc) of being able to switch between modes. (S3 for a while, then S4, eg). To achieve something like that, it makes sense to have something more generic, I think, that can handle these transitions. Then again, maybe I'm just thinking of an extension to runtime PM :> Whatever you do, I will have to work with it. I don't really see what you're aiming at though, so I could do with a bit more brain dump if you're willing. Regards, Nigel --===============64495334222628542== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============64495334222628542==--