From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: RE: [RFC] change suspend_finish order slightly Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:36:15 +1000 Message-ID: <1133832804.6360.40.camel@localhost> References: <59D45D057E9702469E5775CBB56411F10102F4BD@pdsmsx406> Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============79908423095299574==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <59D45D057E9702469E5775CBB56411F10102F4BD@pdsmsx406> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Li Shaohua Cc: Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============79908423095299574== Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi. On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 09:09, Li, Shaohua wrote: > Hi, > > > >On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 13:15, Shaohua Li wrote: > >> The BIOS guys here require ACPI _WAK method which is called in > >> pm_ops->finish is invoked after all CPUs are resumed. Detail info can > be > >> found at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5651. To do this, > >> this patch tries to change the order slightly. Does this break other > >> platforms? > > > >Is it needed even if you call the prepare after hot unplugging other > >cpus? (If so, I need to modify suspend2, too). > Yes. The ACPI _WAK method requires all CPU are booted per the BIOS guys. Ok. Thanks! Nigel --===============79908423095299574== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============79908423095299574==--