From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:08:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1139951339.11659.157.camel@mindpipe> References: <200602142141.10545.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============25057714690070099==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200602142141.10545.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , Kernel development list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============25057714690070099== Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 21:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [BTW, I wonder if it's USB-only, or some other subsystems behave > in a similar way, like ieee1394 or external SATA. And how about > NFS/CIFS/whatever network filesystems mounted on the suspending box?] > NFS is stateless, it does not care about stuff like this. There's no concept of an open file. write() does not return until the data is committed to stable storage. Lee --===============25057714690070099== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============25057714690070099==--