From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@nokia.com>
To: ext Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: David Singleton <daviado@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, david singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: PowerOp Design and working patch
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:12:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155035522.11382.64.camel@Dogbert.NOE.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060808100723.GC4442@elf.ucw.cz>
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:07 +0300, ext Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > >> Often, in the embedded world, the person defining the operating
> > >> states will not be a kernel developer, and may not be comfortable
> > >> with, or capable of, creating a kernel module. (There are
> > >
> > > That's okay, we can create HOWTO or something. 'System designed is
> too
> > > stupid to hack kernel' should not be an argument.
> >
> > It's not a matter of stupidity. The example I gave of not being
> > able to create a kernel module was the situation where loadable
> > module support is not available. A HOWTO wouldn't alter this.
>
> So they need to recompile the kernel. Not a big deal when you are
> developing new machine.
>
1 time yes, several maybe, thousands no.
think about it as finding minimums in a n-dimensional discrete function:
you really don't want to recompile a kernel each time
--
Cheers,
Igor
Igor Stoppa (Nokia M - OSSO / Tampere)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-08 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-28 22:31 PowerOp Design and working patch david singleton
2006-07-28 23:38 ` Greg KH
2006-07-29 0:26 ` david singleton
2006-07-29 0:38 ` david singleton
2006-07-29 0:45 ` Greg KH
2006-07-29 5:12 ` david singleton
2006-07-29 19:07 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-07-30 4:43 ` david singleton
2006-07-30 11:02 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-01 0:59 ` david singleton
2006-08-01 10:09 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-01 10:22 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-01 18:31 ` david singleton
2006-08-01 18:52 ` Tim Bird
2006-08-01 18:59 ` david singleton
2006-08-01 19:17 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-01 19:28 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-06 22:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-07 10:34 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-07 19:45 ` Tim Bird
2006-08-08 10:07 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-08 11:12 ` Igor Stoppa [this message]
2006-08-08 11:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-08 16:43 ` Tim Bird
2006-08-01 12:23 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-01 18:25 ` Tim Bird
2006-08-01 18:02 ` Tim Bird
2006-08-06 22:05 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-07 3:52 ` david singleton
2006-08-07 4:17 ` Greg KH
2006-08-07 4:32 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-07-29 22:09 ` Greg KH
2006-08-01 0:36 ` david singleton
2006-08-01 1:27 ` david singleton
2006-08-07 22:06 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-01 10:09 Matthew Locke
2006-08-07 14:12 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-07 16:58 ` Greg KH
2006-08-08 13:44 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-08 13:52 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-08 15:53 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-08 16:03 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-08 18:10 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-08 13:54 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-08 16:49 ` Tim Bird
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1155035522.11382.64.camel@Dogbert.NOE.nokia.com \
--to=igor.stoppa@nokia.com \
--cc=daviado@gmail.com \
--cc=dsingleton@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox