From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Use suspend_console in swsusp and make it
	configureable
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:34:42 +1000
Message-ID: <1155731682.4433.2.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
References: <200608151509.06087.rjw@sisk.pl>
	 <20060816104143.GC9497@elf.ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1751118AbWHPMeT@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060816104143.GC9497@elf.ucw.cz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@osdl.org>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

Hi.

On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 12:41 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I do not think that is enough. "(WILL TRASH YOUR CMOS)" would be more

But 'trash your cmos' says too much. 'Trash your cmos clock' might be
better.

Regards,

Nigel