Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?

Pavel Machek
2006-08-25T21:27:12Z

Hi!

> > The frequency of entering this state should not interfere with my active
> > use case.
> >
> > -B- After I've put down the USB device, I now can program the internal
> > SOC bus wrapper for the USB to allow idling of the interconnect. I also
> > need to associate the USB remote wake interrupt with a wake up interrupt
> > to restart my interconnect. All devices on that interconnect must be in
> > the same state for the big savings to happen.
> >
> > Certainly for this embedded system, not coordinating the device states
> > means I can't get the big power savings.
>
> Part of this programming has to be done in the architecture-specific
> driver for the interconnect. There already is code being developed to
> suspend USB buses when they aren't in use (although determining _when_
> they aren't in use has not yet been implemented). However this code
> stops

Are there some patches to test? I'd like to power down USB bus, even
when it has device connected (I do not user fingerprint scanner that
much).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html