From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH -mm 1/2]: PM: Fix handling of stopped tasks Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:02:20 +1100 Message-ID: <1165363341.19284.0.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> References: <200612032318.29030.rjw@sisk.pl> <20061205223634.GA2642@elf.ucw.cz> <200612052345.28882.rjw@sisk.pl> <200612060008.51373.rjw@sisk.pl> <20061205234550.GA10914@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061205234550.GA10914@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, pm list , Stephen Hemminger List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi guys. On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:45 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > = > > > > ...after resume. > > > = > > > This is because of how signal_wake_up() works, I think.. > > > = > > > > But I think it is right approach. > > = > > Okay, with the appended patch applied everything seems to work and I do= n't > > see any undesirable side-effects. > = > I promise to try it... tommorow. Looks very good to me. Just to say sorry for my lack of interaction / feedback. Too busy with other stuff at the moment, but I'm trying to keep track :) Nigel