From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH revision 2] windfarm: dont die on suspend thread signal Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:04:34 +1100 Message-ID: <1170716674.2620.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070205183026.989209000@sipsolutions.net> <20070205185835.700233000@sipsolutions.net> <20070205224325.GA8453@lst.de> <1170716074.30959.13.camel@johannes.berg> <1170716641.2620.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1170716641.2620.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Christoph Hellwig , Torrance List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:04 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:54 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > When the windfarm thread gets a suspend signal it will die instead of > > freezing. This fixes it. > = > Don't we still need to call try_to_freeze() ? Forget it... of course we do. Ben.