From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags (was: Re: Remove page flags for software suspend)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:53:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1173369225.9438.32.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703041450.02178.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 14:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Okay, the next three messages contain patches that should do the trick.
>
> They have been tested on x86_64, but not very thoroughly.
They look good to me, but what do I know about swsusp :-)
I'll stick them in my laptop's kernel (boring i386-UP) and see what
happens.
I did notice you don't stick KERN_ prio markers in your printk()s not
sure what to think of that (or if its common practise and I'm just not
aware of it).
Thanks for doing this.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702160212150.21862@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <45E6EEC5.4060902@yahoo.com.au>
[not found] ` <200703011633.54625.rjw@sisk.pl>
2007-03-04 13:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags (was: Re: Remove page flags for software suspend) Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-04 14:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-13 4:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-04 14:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-13 4:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-13 9:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-13 9:23 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-13 10:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-13 10:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-13 21:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-14 3:17 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-14 8:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-04 14:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] mm: Remove nosave and nosave_free " Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-08 1:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags (was: Re: Remove page flags for software suspend) Johannes Berg
2007-03-08 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-08 22:10 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-08 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-08 22:43 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-08 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-08 22:54 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-08 23:15 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-08 23:21 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-08 23:23 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-08 23:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-08 23:36 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-08 15:09 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-08 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-03-08 22:12 ` Johannes Berg
2007-03-08 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-03-08 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1173369225.9438.32.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox