From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] swsusp: Do not use page flags (was: Re: Remove page flags for software suspend) Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:53:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1173369225.9438.32.camel@twins> References: <45E6EEC5.4060902@yahoo.com.au> <200703011633.54625.rjw@sisk.pl> <200703041450.02178.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200703041450.02178.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Nick Piggin , Pavel Machek , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter , Johannes Berg , pm list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 14:50 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Okay, the next three messages contain patches that should do the trick. > = > They have been tested on x86_64, but not very thoroughly. They look good to me, but what do I know about swsusp :-) = I'll stick them in my laptop's kernel (boring i386-UP) and see what happens. I did notice you don't stick KERN_ prio markers in your printk()s not sure what to think of that (or if its common practise and I'm just not aware of it). Thanks for doing this. Peter