From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [6/6] 2.6.21-rc3: known regressions Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:46:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1173818777.13341.128.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070313125025.GW18731@stusta.de> Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070313125025.GW18731@stusta.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Soeren Sonnenburg , Tejun Heo , Michal Piotrowski , Emil Karlson , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Stephane Casset , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Slaby List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 13:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20. > = > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch > of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way > possibly involved with one or more of these issues. > = > Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering. > Subject : Clocksource tsc unstable (delta =3D -154983451 ns) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/9/271 > Submitter : Jiri Slaby > Status : unknown That's not a regression. That's an informal message, when the TSC watchdog detects that the TSC is unreliable. = tglx