From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pm_ops: add irq enable/disable hooks
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:40:33 +1000
Message-ID: <1176327633.8061.102.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0704111006060.3305-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0704111006060.3305-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org


> Have you guys considered using a notifier chain for this?  The platform =

> code could register itself on the chain at boot time.  When suspending yo=
u =

> send out notifications just before and just after disabling interrupts, =

> and inversely on resume.

Except that in the case of the decrementer, I really need to be just
around the actual switching of irqs off ...

Ben.