From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pm_ops: add system quiesce/activate hooks Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:23:25 +1000 Message-ID: <1176503006.5764.105.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1175810054.3489.34.camel@johannes.berg> <200704131347.30001.rjw@sisk.pl> <1176470819.7052.108.camel@johannes.berg> <200704132243.59618.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070413205837.GG28264@elf.ucw.cz> <1176498910.5764.89.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070413215045.GN28264@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070413215045.GN28264@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > We have "drivers" for few chips every PC has, like i8259 timer, > interrupt controller, APIC, etc. Sysdevs and platform devices are > designed for hardware like that. > = > If you want to have a rule "platform device is not supposed to rely on > timers still working", I think you can get that. Such low-level > devices should really use udelay()/mdelay() that spins and does not > need timer hw. That's nonsense. Ben.