From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: shrinking memory for suspend? Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 13:33:36 +0200 Message-ID: <1178192016.13233.94.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1177943076.5102.83.camel@johannes.berg> <20070502112929.GD11316@elf.ucw.cz> <1178114521.13233.56.camel@johannes.berg> <200705031217.30979.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9202799157826909826==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200705031217.30979.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============9202799157826909826== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JmPsZBYHxtSlpeeIOqlM" --=-JmPsZBYHxtSlpeeIOqlM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 12:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I think that on a uniprocessor system it's quite safe, but on SMP it does= n't > seem so. For example, imagine the situation in which one CPU is executin= g the > suspend code while another one is running userspace with system calls etc= . We can still hot-unplug all the other CPUs though, no? johannes --=-JmPsZBYHxtSlpeeIOqlM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGOciQ/ETPhpq3jKURAsRKAJ9qR4K4IqVW/5qjPOi6iWVzQ6Et3gCgj702 8GDlfZcMwhTbDEgIjLtgxqs= =N+iN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-JmPsZBYHxtSlpeeIOqlM-- --===============9202799157826909826== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============9202799157826909826==--