From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Re: lockdep report in hibernate code
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:38:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193567916.3966.14.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0710271827210.2418-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1429 bytes --]
> The "nested" part of the name is a little misleading. The function
> helps the lockdep core distinguish between locks belonging to the same
> class. Normally this is be done so that you can nest the locks in the
> proper order, but that shouldn't stop you from using it here.
Oh good point. I'll test the patch below during the week (my powerbook
doesn't have lockdep and I don't have another machine here right now)
but I'm fairly confident it'll fix the issue. I'll submit it after
testing.
johannes
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/disk.c 2007-10-28 11:34:32.669337294 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/disk.c 2007-10-28 11:37:29.849294324 +0100
@@ -456,7 +456,17 @@ static int software_resume(void)
int error;
unsigned int flags;
- mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
+ /*
+ * name_to_dev_t() below takes a sysfs buffer mutex when sysfs
+ * is configured into the kernel. Since the regular hibernate
+ * trigger path is via sysfs which takes a buffer mutex before
+ * calling hibernate functions (which take pm_mutex) this can
+ * cause lockdep to complain about a possible ABBA deadlock
+ * which cannot happen since we're in the boot code here and
+ * sysfs can't be invoked yet. Therefore, we use a subclass
+ * here to avoid lockdep complaining.
+ */
+ mutex_lock_nested(&pm_mutex, 1);
if (!swsusp_resume_device) {
if (!strlen(resume_file)) {
mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-28 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 14:11 lockdep report in hibernate code Johannes Berg
2007-10-22 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-23 10:34 ` Johannes Berg
2007-10-23 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-23 21:56 ` Alan Stern
2007-10-23 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-24 8:40 ` Johannes Berg
2007-10-24 21:57 ` Greg KH
2007-10-25 13:31 ` Johannes Berg
2007-10-25 17:13 ` Alan Stern
2007-10-26 10:36 ` Johannes Berg
2007-10-27 22:29 ` Alan Stern
2007-10-28 10:38 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193567916.3966.14.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox