From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC] powermac: proper sleep management Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:19:16 +1100 Message-ID: <1194563956.6561.20.camel@pasglop> References: <1194523729.6294.18.camel@johannes.berg> <47336035.4020609@freescale.com> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47336035.4020609@freescale.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Scott Wood Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Johannes Berg , David Woodhouse , linux-pm List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 13:15 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > > +/* > > + * overrides the weak arch_suspend_disable_irqs in kernel/power/main.c > > + * > > + * XXX: Once Scott Wood's patch is merged, this needs to use the ppc_md > > + * hooks that patch adds! > > + */ > > +void arch_suspend_disable_irqs(void) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT > > + /* Tell backlight code not to muck around with the chip anymore */ > > + pmu_backlight_set_sleep(1); > > +#endif > > + > > + /* Call platform functions marked "on sleep" */ > > + pmac_pfunc_i2c_suspend(); > > + pmac_pfunc_base_suspend(); > > Shouldn't these be done from suspend methods of the relevant drivers? > I don't understand why this needs to go in the disable IRQ hook. The pmac_pfunc thing is low level platform stuff, no driver involved there, this is the right place to do it. As for the backlight bits, that could indeed be moved around I suppose, I'd keep it there for now and look at cleaning the PMU driver suspend/resume path in a second step. Ben.