public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] intel_pstate: fix turbo not being used after a processor is rebooted
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 18:13:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12136852.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hFOA97FAq=CwGXgXTkC8aS_vyHjXuaFUppXktrG62H6w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 6:02:50 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:40 PM srinivas pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2022-12-27 at 16:38 +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > > Hi Srinivas,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 24 2022, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 2022-12-23 at 10:10 -0800, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > > > > Hi Pratyush,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 11:39 +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Srinivas,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Dec 21 2022, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 16:52 +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > > > > > > > When a processor is brought offline and online again, it is
> > > > > > > > unable to
> > > > > > > > use Turbo mode because the _PSS table does not contain the
> > > > > > > > whole
> > > > > > > > turbo
> > > > > > > > frequency range, but only +1 MHz above the max non-turbo
> > > > > > > > frequency.
> > > > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > causes problems when ACPI processor driver tries to set
> > > > > > > > frequency
> > > > > > > > constraints. See patch 2 for more details.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > I can reproduce on a Broadwell server platform. But not on a
> > > > > client
> > > > > system with acpi_ppc usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Need to check what change broke this.
> > > >
> > > > When PPC limits enforcement changed to PM QOS, this broke.
> > > > Previously
> > > > acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() was not enforcing any limits.
> > > > It
> > > > was just setting variable. So any update done after
> > > > acpi_register_performance_state() call to pr->performance-
> > > > > states[ppc].core_frequency, was effective.
> > > >
> > > > We don't really need to call
> > > >         ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req,
> > > >                         pr->performance->states[ppc].core_frequency
> > > > *
> > > > 1000);
> > > >
> > > > if the PPC is not changed. When PPC is changed, this gets called
> > > > again,
> > > > so then we can call the above function to update cpufreq limit.
> > > >
> > > > The below change fixed for me.
> > >
> > > Right.
> > I think, this is the only change you require to fix this. In addition
> > set pr->performance_platform_limit = 0 in
> > acpi_processor_unregister_performance().
> 
> Not really, because if the limit is set to a lower frequency and then
> reset to _PSS[0], it needs to be set back to "no limit".
> 
> I'll send a patch for that in a while.

This has not been tested beyond compilation, so please be careful.

---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
 {
 	acpi_status status = 0;
 	unsigned long long ppc = 0;
+	s32 qos_value;
+	int index;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!pr)
@@ -72,17 +74,30 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
 		}
 	}
 
+	index = ppc;
+
+	if (pr->performance_platform_limit == index ||
+	    ppc >= pr->performance->state_count)
+		return 0;
+
 	pr_debug("CPU %d: _PPC is %d - frequency %s limited\n", pr->id,
-		       (int)ppc, ppc ? "" : "not");
+		 index, index ? "is" : "is not");
 
-	pr->performance_platform_limit = (int)ppc;
+	pr->performance_platform_limit = index;
 
-	if (ppc >= pr->performance->state_count ||
-	    unlikely(!freq_qos_request_active(&pr->perflib_req)))
+	if (unlikely(!freq_qos_request_active(&pr->perflib_req)))
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req,
-			pr->performance->states[ppc].core_frequency * 1000);
+	/*
+	 * If _PPC returns 0, it means that all of the available states can be
+	 * used ("no limit").
+	 */
+	if (index == 0)
+		qos_value = FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE;
+	else
+		qos_value = pr->performance->states[index].core_frequency * 1000;
+
+	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req, qos_value);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_warn("Failed to update perflib freq constraint: CPU%d (%d)\n",
 			pr->id, ret);




  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-27 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-21 15:52 [PATCH 0/2] intel_pstate: fix turbo not being used after a processor is rebooted Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-21 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: processor: allow fixing up the frequency for a performance state Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-22 16:23   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-22 22:18     ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-21 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: use acpi perflib to update turbo frequency Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-21 21:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] intel_pstate: fix turbo not being used after a processor is rebooted srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-22 10:39   ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-23 18:10     ` srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-25  0:28       ` srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-27 15:38         ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-27 15:57           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 16:40           ` srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-27 17:02             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 17:13               ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-12-27 18:07               ` srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-27 18:47                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 18:49                   ` srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-27 18:54                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 16:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12136852.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptyadav@amazon.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox