public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 20:51:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12138067.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> (raw)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When _PPC returns 0, it means that the CPU frequency is not limited by
the platform firmware, so make acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
update the frequency QoS request used by it to "no limit" in that case
and avoid updating the QoS request when the _PPC return value has not
changed.

This addresses a problem with limiting CPU frequency artificially on
some systems after CPU offline/online to the frequency that corresponds
to the first entry in the _PSS return package.

While at it, move the _PPC return value check against the state count
earlier to avoid setting performance_platform_limit to an invalid value.

Reported-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
 {
 	acpi_status status = 0;
 	unsigned long long ppc = 0;
+	s32 qos_value;
+	int index;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!pr)
@@ -72,17 +74,30 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
 		}
 	}
 
+	index = ppc;
+
+	if (pr->performance_platform_limit == index ||
+	    ppc >= pr->performance->state_count)
+		return 0;
+
 	pr_debug("CPU %d: _PPC is %d - frequency %s limited\n", pr->id,
-		       (int)ppc, ppc ? "" : "not");
+		 index, index ? "is" : "is not");
 
-	pr->performance_platform_limit = (int)ppc;
+	pr->performance_platform_limit = index;
 
-	if (ppc >= pr->performance->state_count ||
-	    unlikely(!freq_qos_request_active(&pr->perflib_req)))
+	if (unlikely(!freq_qos_request_active(&pr->perflib_req)))
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req,
-			pr->performance->states[ppc].core_frequency * 1000);
+	/*
+	 * If _PPC returns 0, it means that all of the available states can be
+	 * used ("no limit").
+	 */
+	if (index == 0)
+		qos_value = FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE;
+	else
+		qos_value = pr->performance->states[index].core_frequency * 1000;
+
+	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req, qos_value);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_warn("Failed to update perflib freq constraint: CPU%d (%d)\n",
 			pr->id, ret);




             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-27 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-27 19:51 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-12-27 19:52 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-27 20:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI: processor: perflib: Use the "no limit" frequency QoS srinivas pandruvada
2022-12-28 20:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 14:22 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-28 21:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-29 12:58   ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-12-29 19:26     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-30 14:17       ` Pratyush Yadav
2023-01-30 14:58         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-01-30 15:23           ` Pratyush Yadav
2023-02-14 13:40           ` srinivas pandruvada
2023-02-14 13:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-02-14 14:25               ` srinivas pandruvada
2023-02-14 14:41                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 21:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI: processor: perflib: Avoid updating frequency QoS unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-28 21:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12138067.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptyadav@amazon.de \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox