Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Saket Dumbre <saket.dumbre@intel.com>,
	Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: sleep: Avoid breaking S3 wakeup due to might_sleep()
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 17:29:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12252058.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> (raw)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The addition of might_sleep() to down_timeout() caused the latter to
enable interrupts unconditionally in some cases, which in turn broke
the ACPI S3 wakeup path in acpi_suspend_enter(), where down_timeout()
is called by acpi_disable_all_gpes() via acpi_ut_acquire_mutex().

Namely, if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is set, might_sleep() causes
might_resched() to be used and if CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is set,
this triggers __cond_resched() which may call preempt_schedule_common(),
so __schedule() gets invoked and it ends up with enabled interrupts (in
the prev == next case).

Now, enabling interrupts early in the S3 wakeup path causes the kernel
to crash.

Address this by modifying acpi_suspend_enter() to disable GPEs without
attempting to acquire the sleeping lock which is not needed in that code
path anyway.

Fixes: 99409b935c9a ("locking/semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family")
Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---

v1 -> v2:
   * Rephrase the comment in acpi_suspend_enter() (Peter)
   * Fix up the Fixes tag (Peter)
   * Add Peter's ACK

---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/achware.h |    2 --
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c          |   16 ++++++++++++----
 include/acpi/acpixf.h         |    1 +
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/achware.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/achware.h
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/achware.h
@@ -101,8 +101,6 @@ acpi_status
 acpi_hw_get_gpe_status(struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info,
 		       acpi_event_status *event_status);
 
-acpi_status acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes(void);
-
 acpi_status acpi_hw_enable_all_runtime_gpes(void);
 
 acpi_status acpi_hw_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(void);
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpixf.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpixf.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpixf.h
@@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_sta
 						     acpi_event_status
 						     *event_status))
 ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_UINT32(u32 acpi_dispatch_gpe(acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number))
+ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes(void))
 ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status acpi_disable_all_gpes(void))
 ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status acpi_enable_all_runtime_gpes(void))
 ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(void))
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -636,11 +636,19 @@ static int acpi_suspend_enter(suspend_st
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Disable and clear GPE status before interrupt is enabled. Some GPEs
-	 * (like wakeup GPE) haven't handler, this can avoid such GPE misfire.
-	 * acpi_leave_sleep_state will reenable specific GPEs later
+	 * Disable all GPE and clear their status bits before interrupts are
+	 * enabled. Some GPEs (like wakeup GPEs) have no handlers and this can
+	 * prevent them from producing spurious interrups.
+	 *
+	 * acpi_leave_sleep_state() will reenable specific GPEs later.
+	 *
+	 * Because this code runs on one CPU with disabled interrupts (all of
+	 * the other CPUs are offline at this time), it need not acquire any
+	 * sleeping locks which may trigger an implicit preemption point even
+	 * if there is no contention, so avoid doing that by using a low-level
+	 * library routine here.
 	 */
-	acpi_disable_all_gpes();
+	acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes();
 	/* Allow EC transactions to happen. */
 	acpi_ec_unblock_transactions();
 




                 reply	other threads:[~2023-06-14 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12252058.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=saket.dumbre@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox