From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (lichtvoll.de [89.58.27.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C522B16C69D; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.27.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712318079; cv=none; b=X9oX+IXno4DDzxGgoBFwU5ilbEshp86LdUHi0IRP6q/5ilA/46ULJL6BxGv86GxKRc1Wa96507RkuzJMgScSiAC4kPdtiSLwkzUAq7VI+51nmpueugTpEf6TBOKweFCI04d9y8n925BdnU38+M4C8ji8zHglaCdGLrVX4EOO8U0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712318079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8mLPbX2YqMJtrQVpt/7ZkJIQ0ttb96FYDDYY/fHYIho=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gJ+S0GnU9O24qArcPDu7lUzX8u6Ni3ECEdhTIve0LX7s00uSdP3KdlMvn7soA2AD3LNNOu7AymKwYlv9TUuWU895Ur0/52i4SUZRabO/y458lxFzbhbx8LXEmdqu1GPyQXNOG1mMKROrMtOH7dCoIj81EZW/U+GwJ+SN2QvoUK4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtvoll.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtvoll.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.27.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtvoll.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtvoll.de Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05F27A160; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=martin@lichtvoll.de smtp.mailfrom=martin@lichtvoll.de From: Martin Steigerwald To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux regressions mailing list Subject: Re: [regression] 6.8.1: fails to hibernate with pm_runtime_force_suspend+0x0/0x120 returns -16 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:54:34 +0200 Message-ID: <12413606.O9o76ZdvQC@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <6034738.lOV4Wx5bFT@lichtvoll.de> References: <2325246.ElGaqSPkdT@lichtvoll.de> <6034738.lOV4Wx5bFT@lichtvoll.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Martin Steigerwald - 05.04.24, 13:49:00 CEST: > Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) - 19.03.24, 09:40:06 CEST: > > On 16.03.24 17:12, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > Martin Steigerwald - 16.03.24, 17:02:44 CET: > > >> ThinkPad T14 AMD Gen 1 fails to hibernate with self-compiled 6.8.1. > > >> Hibernation works correctly with self-compiled 6.7.9. > > >=20 > > > Apparently 6.8.1 does not even reboot correctly anymore. runit on > > > Devuan. It says it is doing the system reboot but then nothing > > > happens. > > >=20 > > > As for hibernation the kernel cancels the attempt and returns back > > > to > > > user space desktop session. > > >=20 > > >> Trying to use "no_console_suspend" to debug next. Will not do > > >> bisect > > >> between major kernel releases on a production machine. > >=20 > > FWIW, without a bisection I guess no developer will take a closer look > > (but I might be wrong and you lucky here!), as any change in those > > hundreds of drivers used on that machine can possibly lead to problems > > like yours. So without a bisection we are likely stuck here, unless > > someone else runs into the same problem and bisects or fixes it. > > Sorry, but that's just how it is. >=20 > The plot thickens, now 6.7.12 as compared to 6.7.11 which failed > hibernation with busy work queues=C2=B9 and 6.7.9 + bcachefs downgrade fi= xes > fails hibernation with the same error message than 6.8.1: [=E2=80=A6] > Not doing it today or probably the weekend, but now I have some > actionable git bisect plan without bisecting between major kernel > releases which as I have been told between 6.7 an 6.8-rc1 can lead to > non working modeset graphics on AMD Ryzen in between. >=20 > It seems now I only need to git bisect between 6.7.11 and 6.7.12 to find > the patch that breaks hibernation on 6.8.1 as well. However first I > will briefly check whether 6.8.4 hibernates okay. 6.8.4 is still affected and fails hibernation with the same error message. > [1] * 6.7.11: Fails to hibernate - work queues still busy > @ 2024-04-02 19:29 Martin Steigerwald >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/2ad93b57-8fdc-476e-83b7-2c0af1cfd41d > @leemhuis.info/T/#t =2D-=20 Martin