public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] PM: sleep: Fix handling devices with direct_complete set on errors
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:00:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12627587.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net> (raw)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When dpm_suspend() fails, some devices with power.direct_complete set
may not have been handled by device_suspend() yet, so runtime PM has
not been disabled for them yet even though power.direct_complete is set.

Since device_resume() expects that runtime PM has been disabled for all
devices with power.direct_complete set, it will attempt to reenable
runtime PM for the devices that have not been processed by device_suspend()
which does not make sense.  Had those devices had runtime PM disabled
before device_suspend() had run, device_resume() would have inadvertently
enable runtime PM for them, but this is not expected to happen because
it would require ->prepare() callbacks to return positive values for
devices with runtime PM disabled, which would be invalid.

In practice, this issue is most likely benign because pm_runtime_enable()
will not allow the "disable depth" counter to underflow, but it causes a
warning message to be printed for each affected device.

To allow device_resume() to distinguish the "direct complete" devices
that have been processed by device_suspend() from those which have not
been handled by it, make device_suspend() set power.is_suspended for
"direct complete" devices.

Next, move the power.is_suspended check in device_resume() before the
power.direct_complete check in it to make it skip the "direct complete"
devices that have not been handled by device_suspend().

This change is based on a preliminary patch from Saravana Kannan.

Fixes: aae4518b3124 ("PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20241114220921.2529905-2-saravanak@google.com/
Reported-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/main.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -938,6 +938,9 @@
 	if (dev->power.syscore)
 		goto Complete;
 
+	if (!dev->power.is_suspended)
+		goto Complete;
+
 	if (dev->power.direct_complete) {
 		/*
 		 * Allow new children to be added under the device after this
@@ -963,9 +966,6 @@
 	 */
 	dev->power.is_prepared = false;
 
-	if (!dev->power.is_suspended)
-		goto Unlock;
-
 	if (dev->pm_domain) {
 		info = "power domain ";
 		callback = pm_op(&dev->pm_domain->ops, state);
@@ -1005,7 +1005,6 @@
 	error = dpm_run_callback(callback, dev, state, info);
 	dev->power.is_suspended = false;
 
- Unlock:
 	device_unlock(dev);
 	dpm_watchdog_clear(&wd);
 
@@ -1669,6 +1668,7 @@
 			pm_runtime_disable(dev);
 			if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
 				pm_dev_dbg(dev, state, "direct-complete ");
+				dev->power.is_suspended = true;
 				goto Complete;
 			}
 




             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-13 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-13 16:00 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-03-13 21:25 ` [PATCH v1] PM: sleep: Fix handling devices with direct_complete set on errors Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12627587.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox