public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] usb devices don't wake up the system
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:51:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278435118.11623.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1007061106450.1327-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:17 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jul 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> 
> > > > > I want to note that I still need to enable wakeup in /power/acpi/wakeup
> > > > > to make USB mouse wakeup the system.
> > > > > This isn't a regression, but I thought that I don't need that anymore.
> > > 
> > > You shouldn't.  Which setting in /proc/acpi/wakeup needs to be enabled?
> > 
> > The wakeup GPE for UHCI controller which is connected to the mouse.
> 
> I have no idea why you need that.  It's not necessary on my system:
> 
> $ cat /proc/acpi/wakeup 
> Device  S-state   Status   Sysfs node
> P0P4      S4     disabled  pci:0000:00:1e.0
> MC97      S4     disabled  
> USB1      S4     disabled  pci:0000:00:1d.0
> USB2      S4     disabled  pci:0000:00:1d.1
> USB3      S4     disabled  pci:0000:00:1d.2
> USB4      S4     disabled  pci:0000:00:1d.3
> EUSB      S4     disabled  pci:0000:00:1d.7
> PS2K      S4     enabled   pnp:00:09
> PS2M      S4     enabled   pnp:00:0a
> GBEN      S4     disabled  
> 
> > Also, I tried to enable wakeup on the USB mouse using udev rule.
> > 
> > I did that rule for a test (very broad for testing):
> > 
> > SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", ATTR{power/wakeup}="enabled"
> > 
> > I found that running udevd --debug confirms that it writes that attribute 
> > (Log of mouse attach attached :-). (I connected  it to different port now)
> > 
> > According to the log, udev does write 'enabled' to
> > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3/3-2/power/wakeup
> > 
> > but:
> > 
> > maxim@MAIN:~$ cat /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3/3-2/power/wakeup
> > disabled
> > 
> > 
> > This looks like kernel bug.
> 
> I don't think so.  I tried essentially the same experiment, under 
> vanilla 2.6.35-rc4:
> 
> $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/80-local.rules 
> ACTION=="add", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device", ENV{PRODUCT}=="45e/84/*", ATTR{power/wakeup}="enabled"
> 
> (045e and 0084 are the vendor and product IDs for my Microsoft USB 
> optical mouse)
> 
> $ cat /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/usb8/8-2/power/wakeup
> enabled

Nope...

ACTION=="add", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device", ENV{PRODUCT}=="1241/1166/*", ATTR{power/wakeup}="enabled"

maxim@MAIN:~$ cat /sys/bus/usb/devices/5-1/power/wakeup 
disabled



> 
> So if the attribute ends up set to "disabled", it's probably because
> some other program on your machine is changing it.  This isn't the
> kernel's fault.
It can't be.
In older kernel the attribute is set to 'enabled' regardless of udev
rule.
Now it is set to disabled regardless of kernel rule.
I don't think userspace is that rogue... :-)



> 
> > I am not against the default of disabled wakeup, it fact I welcome that, 
> > but I think that udev rule should work to enable it back.
> 
> It does, on my system.  With that rule in place and after manually 
> doing:
                                                  ^^^
You mean 'or' ?

> 
> # echo enabled >/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/power/wakeup
> 
> the mouse does indeed cause the computer to wakeup from suspend.  (But 
> as I mentioned before, it requires double-clicking.)
This might be a feature, to avoid waking up the system by accident.

> 
> Alan Stern
> 

Best regard,
	Maxim Levitsky

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-06 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-30 23:31 [REGRESSION] usb devices don't wake up the system Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-30 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-01  0:28   ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-01 14:42     ` Alan Stern
2010-07-01 18:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-01 20:44       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-01 21:07         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-03 22:41           ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-03 22:42             ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-03 23:27               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-04 12:51               ` Alan Stern
2010-07-04 15:44                 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-06 15:17                   ` Alan Stern
2010-07-06 16:51                     ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2010-07-06 17:07                       ` Alan Stern
2010-07-06 20:51                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-06 23:05                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-07 15:33                           ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1278435118.11623.17.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox