From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 16396] New: [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:25:41 +0300 Message-ID: <1279499141.17672.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20100714194555.2b23d803.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <201007151045.47302.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201007151045.47302.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andrew Morton , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Matthew Garrett , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 10:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, July 15, 2010, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:32:43 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396 > > > > post-2.6.34 regression, bisected to an ACPi commit from Matthew. > > Well, that's something I was afraid of. > > So, the theory that we'll be fine if we do what Windows does really doesn't > match reality. > > Matthew, Len, any ideas? One idea would be to see when exactly windows saves the NVS. Maybe it does that earlier (that it relative to _PTS, device suspend, etc...) Maybe this system run Win7, and MS fixed that bug? Best regards, Maxim Levitsky