From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: [PATCH] x86: Use safe_halt() instead of halt() in acpi_idle_play_dead() Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:56:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1333392977-26468-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: x86@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, tony.luck@gmail.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Using halt() in acpi_idle_play_dead() breaks ia64 build. Use safe_halt() instead. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c index 6b1d32a..784f9a7 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) while (1) { if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_HALT) - halt(); + safe_halt(); else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_SYSTEMIO) { inb(cx->address); /* See comment in acpi_idle_do_entry() */ -- 1.7.3.4