From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] time : set broadcast irq affinity
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:17:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1361917047-29230-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361917047-29230-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
When a cpu goes to a deep idle state where its local timer is shutdown,
it notifies the time frame work to use the broadcast timer instead.
Unfortunately, the broadcast device could wake up any CPU, including an
idle one which is not concerned by the wake up at all.
This implies, in the worst case, an idle CPU will wake up to send an IPI
to another idle cpu.
This patch solves this by setting the irq affinity to the cpu concerned
by the nearest timer event, by this way, the CPU which is wake up is
guarantee to be the one concerned by the next event and we are safe with
unnecessary wakeup for another idle CPU.
As the irq affinity is not supported by all the archs, a flag is needed
to specify which clocksource can handle it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/clockchips.h | 1 +
kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/clockchips.h b/include/linux/clockchips.h
index 6634652..c256cea 100644
--- a/include/linux/clockchips.h
+++ b/include/linux/clockchips.h
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ enum clock_event_nofitiers {
*/
#define CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP 0x000008
#define CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DUMMY 0x000010
+#define CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ 0x000020
/**
* struct clock_event_device - clock event device descriptor
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
index 6197ac0..1f7b4f4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -406,13 +406,36 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask(void)
return to_cpumask(tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask);
}
-static int tick_broadcast_set_event(struct clock_event_device *bc,
+/*
+ * Set broadcast interrupt affinity
+ */
+static void tick_broadcast_set_affinity(struct clock_event_device *bc, int cpu)
+{
+ if (!(bc->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ))
+ return;
+
+ if (cpumask_equal(bc->cpumask, cpumask_of(cpu)))
+ return;
+
+ bc->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
+ irq_set_affinity(bc->irq, bc->cpumask);
+}
+
+static int tick_broadcast_set_event(struct clock_event_device *bc, int cpu,
ktime_t expires, int force)
{
+ int ret;
+
if (bc->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT)
clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT);
- return clockevents_program_event(bc, expires, force);
+ ret = clockevents_program_event(bc, expires, force);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ tick_broadcast_set_affinity(bc, cpu);
+
+ return 0;
}
int tick_resume_broadcast_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc)
@@ -441,7 +464,7 @@ static void tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev)
{
struct tick_device *td;
ktime_t now, next_event;
- int cpu;
+ int cpu, next_cpu;
raw_spin_lock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
again:
@@ -454,8 +477,10 @@ again:
td = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, cpu);
if (td->evtdev->next_event.tv64 <= now.tv64)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(tmpmask));
- else if (td->evtdev->next_event.tv64 < next_event.tv64)
+ else if (td->evtdev->next_event.tv64 < next_event.tv64) {
next_event.tv64 = td->evtdev->next_event.tv64;
+ next_cpu = cpu;
+ }
}
/*
@@ -478,7 +503,7 @@ again:
* Rearm the broadcast device. If event expired,
* repeat the above
*/
- if (tick_broadcast_set_event(dev, next_event, 0))
+ if (tick_broadcast_set_event(dev, next_cpu, next_event, 0))
goto again;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
@@ -521,7 +546,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_oneshot_control(unsigned long reason)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask());
clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN);
if (dev->next_event.tv64 < bc->next_event.tv64)
- tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, dev->next_event, 1);
+ tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, cpu, dev->next_event, 1);
}
} else {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_get_broadcast_oneshot_mask())) {
@@ -590,7 +615,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc)
clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT);
tick_broadcast_init_next_event(to_cpumask(tmpmask),
tick_next_period);
- tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, tick_next_period, 1);
+ tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, cpu, tick_next_period, 1);
} else
bc->next_event.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
} else {
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-26 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-26 22:17 [PATCH 0/4] time: dynamic irq affinity Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-26 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] time : pass broadcast parameter Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-27 5:09 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-26 22:17 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2013-02-27 5:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] time : set broadcast irq affinity Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-26 22:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: nomadik: add dynamic irq flag to the timer Daniel Lezcano
2013-03-01 1:13 ` Linus Walleij
2013-03-01 8:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-03-01 13:28 ` Rickard Andersson
2013-02-26 22:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: timer-sp: Set dynamic irq affinity Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-27 4:56 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-27 4:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-27 5:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-27 6:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] time: " Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-27 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-27 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-10 17:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-10 18:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-03-11 3:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-11 8:40 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-03-11 9:12 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-11 9:28 ` Rickard Andersson
2013-03-11 10:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1361917047-29230-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).