From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support
 other architectures
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:50:01 +1000
Message-ID: <1376628601.4255.138.camel@pasglop>
References: <1374492747-13879-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
 <1376586580-5409-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
 <1376586580-5409-4-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <1376586580-5409-4-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux@openrisc.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 18:09 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>                /* Check for ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s. If it doesn't exist
>                  * fallback to "reg" property and assume no threads
>                  */
> -

Oh and I forgot ... that comment is now wrong, since your code handles
threads in the "reg" case...

Cheers,
Ben.