From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: eduardo.valentin@ti.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Thermal: x86_pkg_temp: change spin lock
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:47:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380116868.2422.0.camel@rzhang1-mobl4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380045916-29833-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 11:05 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> x86_pkg_temp receives thermal notifications via a callback from a
> therm_throt driver, where thermal interrupts are processed.
> This callback is pkg_temp_thermal_platform_thermal_notify. Here to
> avoid multiple interrupts from cores in a package, we disable the
> source and also set a variable to avoid scheduling delayed work function.
> This variable is protected via spin_lock_irqsave. On one buggy platform,
> we still receiving interrupts even if the source is disabled. This
> can cause deadlock/lockdep warning, when interrupt is generated while under
> spinlock in work function.
> Change spin_lock to spin_lock_irqsave and spin_unlock to
> spin_unlock_irqrestore as the data it is trying to protect can also
> be modified in a notification call called from interrupt handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
applied to thermal .next.
thanks,
rui
> ---
> drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> index f36950e..7722cb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
> @@ -316,18 +316,19 @@ static void pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> int phy_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> struct phy_dev_entry *phdev = pkg_temp_thermal_get_phy_entry(cpu);
> bool notify = false;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> if (!phdev)
> return;
>
> - spin_lock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> ++pkg_work_cnt;
> if (unlikely(phy_id > max_phy_id)) {
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> return;
> }
> pkg_work_scheduled[phy_id] = 0;
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
>
> enable_pkg_thres_interrupt();
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
> @@ -397,6 +398,7 @@ static int pkg_temp_thermal_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> int thres_count;
> u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> u8 *temp;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> cpuid(6, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> thres_count = ebx & 0x07;
> @@ -420,19 +422,19 @@ static int pkg_temp_thermal_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> goto err_ret_unlock;
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> if (topology_physical_package_id(cpu) > max_phy_id)
> max_phy_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> temp = krealloc(pkg_work_scheduled,
> (max_phy_id+1) * sizeof(u8), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!temp) {
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_ret_free;
> }
> pkg_work_scheduled = temp;
> pkg_work_scheduled[topology_physical_package_id(cpu)] = 0;
> - spin_unlock(&pkg_work_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_work_lock, flags);
>
> phy_dev_entry->phys_proc_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> phy_dev_entry->first_cpu = cpu;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 18:05 [PATCH] Thermal: x86_pkg_temp: change spin lock Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-09-25 13:47 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380116868.2422.0.camel@rzhang1-mobl4 \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).