* [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator, part 2
@ 2013-09-26 9:19 Philipp Zabel
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Philipp Zabel @ 2013-09-26 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pm; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Mark Brown, kernel,
Philipp Zabel
Since the patch "cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator", cpu_reg
contains an error value if the regulator is not set, instead of NULL.
Accordingly, fix the remaining check for non-NULL cpu_reg.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
index 78c49d8..c522a95 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency))
transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
- if (cpu_reg) {
+ if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
struct opp *opp;
unsigned long min_uV, max_uV;
int i;
--
1.8.4.rc3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-09-26 9:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-26 9:19 [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator, part 2 Philipp Zabel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).