From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, markgross@thegnar.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [7/11] use-case 1: Webbrowsing on Android
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:45:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387557951-21750-8-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387557951-21750-1-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Common webbrowsing use-cases (no embedded videos, but dynamic contents
is ok) typically exhibit three distinct modes of operation depending on
what it is doing in relation to the user:
1)
Mode: Page load and rendering.
Behaviour: The duration is highly depends on the website but is
relatively short. Typically a few seconds. Page loading time impacts
user experience directly. Minor performance drops may be acceptable if
it comes with good overall energy savings.
Performance criteria: Complete as fast as possible.
2)
Mode: Display website (user reading, no user interaction)
Behaviour: Low load. Only minor updates of dynamic contents.
Performance criteria: Minimize energy.
3)
Mode: Page scrolling.
Behaviour: Relatively short in duration. Rendering of contents which was
previously off screen.
Performance criteria: Ensure smooth UI interaction. Without UI
experience feedback (lag, etc.), optimizing for best performance might
the only way to get necessary performance.
Task behaviour
The task descriptions are based on traces from a modern ARM platform
with a fairly recent version of Android. It may be different other
platforms and software stacks. This serves just as an example.
There are three main tasks involved on the browser side, and one or more
tasks related to the graphics driver. Each of them behaves differently
in each of the three modes of operation.
Render task: Mainly active in mode 1, but also active in mode 3.
Accounts for about a third of the total cpu time. May run for a more or
less continuous burst of 1-2s in 1.
Texture task: Active in all modes, but mainly in modes 1 and 3. Active
after the render task burst in mode 1. Somewhat periodic behaviour
during modes 1 and 3 indicating dependencies on other tasks. Account
for about a sixth of the cpu time.
Browser task: Active in all modes. Blocks often. Only running about half
the time when it is active. Short occasional periods of activity in mode
2 along with the texture task. Accounts for about a third of the cpu
time.
Graphics driver task: Mainly active in mode 1 and 3, very little
activity in mode 2 and only when browser and texture tasks are
active. Runs for a short amount of time but frequently when active.
Accounts for about a sixth of the cpu time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-20 16:45 [0/11] Energy-aware scheduling use-cases and scheduler issues Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [1/11] issue 1: Missing power topology information in scheduler Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-22 15:19 ` mark gross
2013-12-30 14:00 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-13 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-14 16:21 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-14 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [2/11] issue 2: Energy-awareness for heterogeneous systems Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [3/11] issue 3: No understanding of potential cpu capacity Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [4/11] issue 4: Tracking idle states Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [5/11] issue 5: Frequency and uarch invariant task load Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [6/11] issue 6: Poor and non-deterministic performance on heterogeneous systems Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` Morten Rasmussen [this message]
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [8/11] use-case 2: Audio playback on Android Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-07 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 16:02 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-07 15:55 ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [9/11] use-case 3: Video " Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [10/11] use-case 4: Game " Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-20 16:45 ` [11/11] system 1: Saving energy using DVFS Morten Rasmussen
2013-12-22 16:28 ` [0/11] Energy-aware scheduling use-cases and scheduler issues mark gross
2013-12-30 12:10 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-12 16:47 ` mark gross
2014-01-13 12:04 ` Catalin Marinas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-07 16:19 [0/11][REPOST] " Morten Rasmussen
2014-01-07 16:19 ` [7/11] use-case 1: Webbrowsing on Android Morten Rasmussen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1387557951-21750-8-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--to=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).