linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq, fix locking around CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT calls
Date: Wed,  5 Nov 2014 09:53:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415199239-19019-3-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415199239-19019-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>

commit 955ef4833574636819cd269cfbae12f79cbde63a (" cpufreq: Drop rwsem
lock around CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT") opens up a hole in the locking
scheme for cpufreq.

Simple tests such as rapidly switching the governor between ondemand and
performance or attempting to read policy values while a governor switch occurs
now fail with very NULL pointer warnings, sysfs namespace collisions, and
system hangs.  In short, the locking that policy->rwsem is supposed to provide
is currently broken.

The identified commit attempts to resolve a lockdep warning by removing
a lock around a section of code which does a shutdown of the
existing policy.  The problem is that this is part of the _critical_ section of
code that switches the governors and must be protected by the lock; without
locking readers may access now NULL or stale data, and writes may collide with
each other.

With the previous patch, which now returns -EBUSY during times of
contention the deadlock reported in
955ef4833574636819cd269cfbae12f79cbde63a (" cpufreq: Drop rwsem lock
around CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT") cannot occur, so adding the locks back
into this section of code is possible.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |    4 ----
 include/linux/cpufreq.h   |    4 ----
 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 3f09ca9..e33cb15 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2222,9 +2222,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	/* end old governor */
 	if (old_gov) {
 		__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
-		up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 		__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
-		down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	}
 
 	/* start new governor */
@@ -2233,9 +2231,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START))
 			goto out;
 
-		up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 		__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
-		down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	}
 
 	/* new governor failed, so re-start old one */
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 503b085..43909ad 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -100,10 +100,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
 	 * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
 	 *   the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
 	 *   mode before doing so.
-	 *
-	 * Additional rules:
-	 * - Lock should not be held across
-	 *     __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
 	 */
 	struct rw_semaphore	rwsem;
 
-- 
1.7.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-05 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1415199239-19019-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>
2014-11-05 14:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq, do not return stale data to userspace Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-05 14:53 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2014-11-10 10:44   ` [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq, fix locking around CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT calls Viresh Kumar
2014-11-10 12:26     ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-11  3:37       ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-11 12:15         ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-11 13:07           ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-13 21:58             ` Saravana Kannan
2014-11-05 14:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq, dbs_data->usage count must be atomic Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-08  1:57   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-11  3:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-05 14:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq, policy->initialized " Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-08  1:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-11  3:55   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-05 14:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq, add BUG() messages in critical paths to aid debugging failures Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-08  2:00   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-08 13:33     ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-08 21:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-09 14:12         ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-11  4:23   ` Viresh Kumar
2014-11-11 12:18     ` Prarit Bhargava
2014-11-11 13:11       ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1415199239-19019-3-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com \
    --to=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).