From: Maurice Petallo <mauricex.r.petallo@intel.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Maurice Petallo <mauricex.r.petallo@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] thermal: Don't call thermal_zone_device_update inside spinlock
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:47:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415875624-587-1-git-send-email-mauricex.r.petallo@intel.com> (raw)
The driver calls spin_lock_irqsave during DTS interrupt. The interrupt
handle then calls thermal_zone_device_update which implicitly calls
a sleep function and produce the following bug:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:97
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 920, name: irq/86-soc_dts
CPU: 0 PID: 920 Comm: irq/86-soc_dts Tainted: G            E  3.17.0-rc2+ #1
Hardware name: Intel Corp. VALLEYVIEW B3 PLATFORM/NOTEBOOK, BIOS BYTICRB1.86C.0092.R31.1408290850 08/29/2014
 00000000 00000000 c25dbe74 c1818cfd f3cc488c c25dbe9c c1059305 c1b4063b
 00000001 00000001 00000398 f3cc488c f6817644 f6817644 f3ecc6c0 c25dbea8
 c18208f2 f6817400 c25dbebc c159b0bb c25dbedc f6817400 f32a2300 c25dbee8
Call Trace:
 [<c1818cfd>] dump_stack+0x48/0x60
 [<c1059305>] __might_sleep+0xec/0xf4
 [<c18208f2>] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x34
 [<c159b0bb>] thermal_zone_get_temp+0x34/0x59
 [<c159bde5>] thermal_zone_device_update+0x2d/0xcb
 [<f85da16a>] ? iosf_mbi_write+0x6c/0x74 [iosf_mbi]
 [<f7c7445d>] soc_irq_thread_fn+0x10c/0x163 [intel_soc_dts_thermal]
 [<c107b72b>] irq_thread_fn+0x18/0x2a
 [<c107bedb>] irq_thread+0x81/0x11f
 [<c107b713>] ? irq_finalize_oneshot+0x7c/0x7c
 [<c107bf79>] ? irq_thread+0x11f/0x11f
 [<c107be5a>] ? wake_threads_waitq+0x31/0x31
 [<c1054217>] kthread+0x87/0x8c
 [<c1821e41>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30
 [<c1054190>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x55/0x55
Signed-off-by: Maurice Petallo <mauricex.r.petallo@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel_soc_dts_thermal.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel_soc_dts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel_soc_dts_thermal.c
index a6a0a18..5580f5b 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_soc_dts_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_soc_dts_thermal.c
@@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ static void proc_thermal_interrupt(void)
 	u32 sticky_out;
 	int status;
 	u32 ptmc_out;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&intr_notify_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Clear APIC interrupt */
 	status = iosf_mbi_read(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, BT_MBI_BUNIT_READ,
@@ -378,21 +381,20 @@ static void proc_thermal_interrupt(void)
 		/* reset sticky bit */
 		status = iosf_mbi_write(BT_MBI_UNIT_PMC, BT_MBI_BUNIT_WRITE,
 					SOC_DTS_OFFSET_PTTSS, sticky_out);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intr_notify_lock, flags);
+
 		for (i = 0; i < SOC_MAX_DTS_SENSORS; ++i) {
 			pr_debug("TZD update for zone %d\n", i);
 			thermal_zone_device_update(soc_dts[i]->tzone);
 		}
-	}
+	} else
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intr_notify_lock, flags);
 
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t soc_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_data)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&intr_notify_lock, flags);
 	proc_thermal_interrupt();
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intr_notify_lock, flags);
 	pr_debug("proc_thermal_interrupt\n");
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
-- 
1.7.9.5
next             reply	other threads:[~2014-11-13 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-13 10:47 Maurice Petallo [this message]
2014-11-25  5:23 ` [PATCH] thermal: Don't call thermal_zone_device_update inside spinlock Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-25 17:56   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2014-11-28  2:08     ` Petallo, MauriceX R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1415875624-587-1-git-send-email-mauricex.r.petallo@intel.com \
    --to=mauricex.r.petallo@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).