From: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
To: "jwboyer@fedoraproject.org" <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"edubezval@gmail.com" <edubezval@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: intel_soc_dts_thermal binding issues
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 02:43:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425868993.3944.30.camel@spandruv-mobl2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+5PVA6oBotk-SLnwYvpAp-U+sPt+pRP-0AtyAD2H+qnekEqAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 08:51 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> > Please attach the acpidump output.
>
> Attached for my machine.
>
There is no INT3401 in the acpi dump. Also no one registered IRQ 86.
So the request_irq failing.
It is not a problem, this platform can't support.
Do we want to silently bail out?
Thanks,
Srinivas
> josh
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > rui
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Josh Boyer
> > Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2015 10:30 PM
> > To: Zhang, Rui
> > Cc: Eduardo Valentin; Linux PM list; Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org
> > Subject: Re: intel_soc_dts_thermal binding issues
> > Importance: High
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Zhang, Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> >> What kernel are you using?
> >> I think it should be fixed by commit 014d9d5d0cc1da79bbe48fbc5e1068c5616238d2, which is merged in 3.19-rc5.
> >
> > The reporter with the ASUS machine was running 3.18.7. However, on my NUC machine I still see this with 4.0-rc2 and the latest Linus tree:
> >
> > [jwboyer@nuc-celeron ~]$ uname -a
> > Linux nuc-celeron 4.0.0-0.rc2.git1.1.fc23.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 5
> > 08:37:23 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [jwboyer@nuc-celeron ~]$ dmesg | grep request_threaded
> > [ 11.187239] intel_soc_dts_thermal: request_threaded_irq ret -22
> > [ 11.261738] intel_soc_dts_thermal: request_threaded_irq ret -22
> > [jwboyer@nuc-celeron ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model name"
> > model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2820 @ 2.13GHz
> > model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2820 @ 2.13GHz
> > [jwboyer@nuc-celeron ~]$
> >
> > The 4.0.0-rc2.git1.1 above corresponds to Linux v4.0-rc2-150-g6587457b4b3d in mainline. We aren't carrying any patches that would impact this.
> >
> > The commit you pointed to seems to imply that either INT340X_THERMAL or INTEL_SOC_DTS_THERMAL could be set, but not both. In Fedora, we have them both enabled as modules:
> >
> > [jwboyer@nuc-celeron ~]$ grep _THERMAL=m
> > /boot/config-4.0.0-0.rc2.git1.1.fc23.x86_64
> > CONFIG_X86_PKG_TEMP_THERMAL=m
> > CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_DTS_THERMAL=m
> > CONFIG_INT340X_THERMAL=m
> > [jwboyer@nuc-celeron ~]$
> >
> > Maybe the commit should be checking for INTEL_SOC_DTS_THERMAL unconditionally, and not as an #elfi?
> >
> > josh
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> rui
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: jwboyer@gmail.com [mailto:jwboyer@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Josh
> >> Boyer
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:05 PM
> >> To: Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin
> >> Cc: Linux PM list; Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org
> >> Subject: intel_soc_dts_thermal binding issues
> >> Importance: High
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We've seen a number of reports where people see:
> >>
> >> [ 20.499427] intel_soc_dts_thermal: request_threaded_irq ret -22
> >> [ 20.519160] intel_soc_dts_thermal: request_threaded_irq ret -22
> >> [ 20.532660] intel_soc_dts_thermal: request_threaded_irq ret -22
> >>
> >> in their boot logs. They view this as a kernel bug and report is as such. The above log came from an ASUS x200ma machine, which has a quad core Baytrail-M Pentium CPU (N3530).
> >>
> >> I can't tell if the issue is because the driver is trying to bind to all 4 cores and only CPU0 works, or what other issue would cause this.
> >> I personally have a Celeron based NUC with a N2820 that gets the error above for both cores and the driver doesn't load at all.
> >>
> >> Is there something else the driver should be doing to bind to the various CPUs? If there's nothing else it can key off of, can we drop the pr_err so it stops showing up in dmesg?
> >>
> >> josh
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-09 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 14:04 intel_soc_dts_thermal binding issues Josh Boyer
2015-03-05 1:55 ` Zhang, Rui
2015-03-05 14:29 ` Josh Boyer
2015-03-06 1:37 ` Zhang, Rui
2015-03-06 13:51 ` Josh Boyer
2015-03-09 2:43 ` Pandruvada, Srinivas [this message]
2015-03-09 13:11 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425868993.3944.30.camel@spandruv-mobl2 \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox