From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javi Merino Subject: [PATCH v5 5/5] PM / devfreq: drop comment about thermal setting max_freq Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:55:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1440672951-7002-6-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> References: <1440672951-7002-1-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1440672951-7002-1-git-send-email-javi.merino@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cw00.choi@samsung.com, rufus.hamade@imgtec.com, edubezval@gmail.com, Javi Merino , MyungJoo Ham List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org The thermal infrastructure should use the devfreq cooling device, which uses the OPP library to disable OPPs as necessary. Fix a couple of typos in the same comment while we are at it. Cc: MyungJoo Ham Signed-off-by: Javi Merino --- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c index ca1b362d77e2..aed1137b2173 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c @@ -177,10 +177,10 @@ int update_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq) return err; /* - * Adjust the freuqency with user freq and QoS. + * Adjust the frequency with user freq and QoS. * - * List from the highest proiority - * max_freq (probably called by thermal when it's too hot) + * List from the highest priority + * max_freq * min_freq */ -- 1.9.1