From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: imx6q: Fix regulator/clock error handling
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:51:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446022288.3138.6.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446019154-16384-4-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2015, 08:59 +0100 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> When one of the regulator_get/clk_get calls fails the driver just
> returns -ENOENT. To properly handle the -EPROBE_DEFER case we have
> to forward the actual error value instead. This patch fixes that.
>
> Since all clocks/regulators are global static variables the IS_ERR()
> check in the error path in probe() may erroneously work on the values
> assigned in the previous probe run. This means we have to reinitialize
> the variables between two probe runs().
>
> The probe function already is quite overloaded, so this patch moves
> the regulator and clock allocation into a separate function and the
> dropping of these resourced into a corresponding cleanup function.
> This is easier to review for correctness than the current mix of
> reverse-cleanup and !IS_ERR checks at the end of probe().
>
> While at it leave a comment that these resource allocations can't use
> devm_* to prevent people from trying to convert it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Looks good to me now,
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> index 6fefd19..f81cf8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,103 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver imx6q_cpufreq_driver = {
> .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
> };
>
> +static int imx6q_cpufreq_get_resources(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Do not use devm_* here. The resources are bound to the
> + * cpu_dev and not to this drivers platform_device.
> + */
> + arm_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> + if (IS_ERR(arm_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(arm_clk);
> +
> + pll1_sys_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sys");
> + if (IS_ERR(pll1_sys_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(pll1_sys_clk);
> +
> + pll1_sw_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sw");
> + if (IS_ERR(pll1_sw_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(pll1_sw_clk);
> +
> + step_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "step");
> + if (IS_ERR(step_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(step_clk);
> +
> + pll2_pfd2_396m_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_pfd2_396m");
> + if (IS_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> +
> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> + pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus");
> + if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(pll2_bus_clk);
> +
> + secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel");
> + if (IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(secondary_sel_clk);
> + }
> +
> + arm_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> + if (IS_ERR(arm_reg))
> + return PTR_ERR(arm_reg);
> +
> + pu_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "pu");
> +
> + soc_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "soc");
> + if (IS_ERR(soc_reg))
> + return PTR_ERR(soc_reg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void imx6q_cpufreq_put_resources(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Set all resources to NULL here so that they are correctly
> + * initialized next time we enter probe()
> + */
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_reg))
> + regulator_put(arm_reg);
> + arm_reg = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pu_reg))
> + regulator_put(pu_reg);
> + pu_reg = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(soc_reg))
> + regulator_put(soc_reg);
> + soc_reg = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(arm_clk))
> + clk_put(arm_clk);
> + arm_clk = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pll1_sys_clk))
> + clk_put(pll1_sys_clk);
> + pll1_sys_clk = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pll1_sw_clk))
> + clk_put(pll1_sw_clk);
> + pll1_sw_clk = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(step_clk))
> + clk_put(step_clk);
> + step_clk = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk))
> + clk_put(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> + pll2_pfd2_396m_clk = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pll2_bus_clk))
> + clk_put(pll2_bus_clk);
> + pll2_bus_clk = NULL;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(secondary_sel_clk))
> + clk_put(secondary_sel_clk);
> + secondary_sel_clk = NULL;
> +}
> +
> static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> @@ -198,36 +295,9 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - arm_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> - pll1_sys_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sys");
> - pll1_sw_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll1_sw");
> - step_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "step");
> - pll2_pfd2_396m_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_pfd2_396m");
> - if (IS_ERR(arm_clk) || IS_ERR(pll1_sys_clk) || IS_ERR(pll1_sw_clk) ||
> - IS_ERR(step_clk) || IS_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk)) {
> - dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get clocks\n");
> - ret = -ENOENT;
> - goto put_clk;
> - }
> -
> - if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul")) {
> - pll2_bus_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "pll2_bus");
> - secondary_sel_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "secondary_sel");
> - if (IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk) || IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk)) {
> - dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get clocks specific to imx6ul\n");
> - ret = -ENOENT;
> - goto put_clk;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - arm_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "arm");
> - pu_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "pu");
> - soc_reg = regulator_get(cpu_dev, "soc");
> - if (IS_ERR(arm_reg) || IS_ERR(soc_reg)) {
> - dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to get regulators\n");
> - ret = -ENOENT;
> - goto put_reg;
> - }
> + ret = imx6q_cpufreq_get_resources();
> + if (ret)
> + goto drop_resources;
>
> /*
> * We expect an OPP table supplied by platform.
> @@ -239,7 +309,7 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(cpu_dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to init OPP table: %d\n", ret);
> - goto put_reg;
> + goto drop_resources;
> }
>
> /* Because we have added the OPPs here, we must free them */
> @@ -348,28 +418,9 @@ free_freq_table:
> out_free_opp:
> if (free_opp)
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(cpu_dev);
> -put_reg:
> - if (!IS_ERR(arm_reg))
> - regulator_put(arm_reg);
> - if (!IS_ERR(pu_reg))
> - regulator_put(pu_reg);
> - if (!IS_ERR(soc_reg))
> - regulator_put(soc_reg);
> -put_clk:
> - if (!IS_ERR(arm_clk))
> - clk_put(arm_clk);
> - if (!IS_ERR(pll1_sys_clk))
> - clk_put(pll1_sys_clk);
> - if (!IS_ERR(pll1_sw_clk))
> - clk_put(pll1_sw_clk);
> - if (!IS_ERR(step_clk))
> - clk_put(step_clk);
> - if (!IS_ERR(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk))
> - clk_put(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> - if (!IS_ERR(pll2_bus_clk))
> - clk_put(pll2_bus_clk);
> - if (!IS_ERR(secondary_sel_clk))
> - clk_put(secondary_sel_clk);
> +drop_resources:
> + imx6q_cpufreq_put_resources();
> +
> of_node_put(np);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -380,17 +431,8 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> if (free_opp)
> dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(cpu_dev);
> - regulator_put(arm_reg);
> - if (!IS_ERR(pu_reg))
> - regulator_put(pu_reg);
> - regulator_put(soc_reg);
> - clk_put(arm_clk);
> - clk_put(pll1_sys_clk);
> - clk_put(pll1_sw_clk);
> - clk_put(step_clk);
> - clk_put(pll2_pfd2_396m_clk);
> - clk_put(pll2_bus_clk);
> - clk_put(secondary_sel_clk);
> +
> + imx6q_cpufreq_put_resources();
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-28 7:59 [PATCH v2] cpufreq: i.MX6: -EPROBE_DEFER fixes Sascha Hauer
2015-10-28 7:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: imx6q: Fix goto wrong error label Sascha Hauer
2015-10-28 7:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: imx6q: Fix wrong device in devm_kzalloc Sascha Hauer
2015-10-28 8:49 ` Lucas Stach
2015-10-28 7:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: imx6q: Fix regulator/clock error handling Sascha Hauer
2015-10-28 8:51 ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2015-10-28 7:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: imx6q: Use id_table to distinguish between SoCs Sascha Hauer
2015-10-28 9:00 ` Lucas Stach
2015-12-14 1:30 ` Shawn Guo
2015-10-28 7:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: imx6q: pu regulator is not optional Sascha Hauer
2015-12-11 17:23 ` [PATCH v2] cpufreq: i.MX6: -EPROBE_DEFER fixes Lucas Stach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1446022288.3138.6.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).