From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, prarit@redhat.com, trenn@suse.de,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change powersave to ondemand policy
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:31:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449613890-10403-5-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449613890-10403-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Move the current Intel powersave policy processing to ondemand policy.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index fb92402..76108e6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static struct perf_limits performance_limits = {
.min_sysfs_pct = 0,
};
-static struct perf_limits powersave_limits = {
+static struct perf_limits ondemand_limits = {
.no_turbo = 0,
.turbo_disabled = 0,
.max_perf_pct = 100,
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static struct perf_limits powersave_limits = {
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE
static struct perf_limits *limits = &performance_limits;
#else
-static struct perf_limits *limits = &powersave_limits;
+static struct perf_limits *limits = &ondemand_limits;
#endif
static inline void pid_reset(struct _pid *pid, int setpoint, int busy,
@@ -1143,8 +1143,8 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
}
- pr_debug("intel_pstate: set powersave\n");
- limits = &powersave_limits;
+ pr_debug("intel_pstate: set ondemand\n");
+ limits = &ondemand_limits;
limits->min_policy_pct = (policy->min * 100) / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
limits->min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->min_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
limits->max_policy_pct = DIV_ROUND_UP(policy->max * 100,
@@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy);
- if (policy->policy != CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE &&
+ if (policy->policy != CPUFREQ_POLICY_ONDEMAND &&
policy->policy != CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1215,8 +1215,10 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (limits->min_perf_pct == 100 && limits->max_perf_pct == 100)
policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
else
- policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE;
+ policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_ONDEMAND;
+ policy->available_policies = CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE |
+ CPUFREQ_POLICY_ONDEMAND;
policy->min = cpu->pstate.min_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling;
policy->max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling;
--
2.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 22:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] cpufreq governors and Intel P state driver compatibility Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-12-08 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cpufreq: Add configurable generic policies Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-12-09 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: Add ondemand as a generic policy Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-12-08 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation: cpu-freq: update setpolicy documentation Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-12-09 2:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-08 22:31 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2015-12-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cpufreq governors and Intel P state driver compatibility Prarit Bhargava
2015-12-08 23:57 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-12-09 13:12 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-12-09 16:18 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2015-12-16 19:33 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449613890-10403-5-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).