From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:16:07 +0530 Message-ID: <1453715167-26165-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Return-path: Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:51211 "EHLO e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756057AbcAYJq2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2016 04:46:28 -0500 Received: from localhost by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 02:46:26 -0700 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shilpasri G Bhat , Juri Lelli , "Gautham R. Shenoy" Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last primitive instead. Cc: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 78b1e2f..b3059a3 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, { lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock); do { - policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list); - /* No more policies in the list */ - if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list) + if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list)) return NULL; + + policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list); } while (!suitable_policy(policy, active)); return policy; -- 1.9.3