From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Biggers Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver() Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:50:01 -0600 Message-ID: <1456026601-31282-1-git-send-email-ebiggers3@gmail.com> Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:32958 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751116AbcBUTfH (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:35:07 -0500 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332 ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index e979ec7..bfefc91 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled); * submitted by the CPU Frequency driver. * * Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code - * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first + * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first * (and isn't unregistered in the meantime). * */ -- 2.7.1